Since its purpose is to provide an overview of classifications it does not take the place of lists and search when one knows exactly that for which they are looking. I think that perhaps you had a knee-jerk reaction to something that looks like a mind-map yet, with respect, is not. I’ll take a cue from Korm and edit later. I apologize in advance because its late and I’m tired from the aforementioned travel. I’m not a nay-sayer, but like Steve Martin’s boss in “Parenthood”, I’m saying “Dazzle me!”.Īpologies for missing Korm’s posts. Yet, their showcases remain unconvincing, at least for me. And who better would do this than the people who want to sell this kind of software. I really would like to see an eye-opening example that could pull me into this. What about everything that “is a pdf, contains the word aperture, but not the word lightroom”? Visualizations are limited largely to 2 dimensions (well, with crazy arrows going all over the place between mindmap clouds, this can be a little expanded, but not much), and that’s not enough for most things.Ī funny example is the infamous “Afghanistan Stability/COIN Dynamics” chart: Do we really need this graph above to find out that there is a pdf in the collection that contains the word “aperture”? And worse: This only makes sense for the simplest associations. They immediately make me wonder why all this graphical power is needed to represent something that trivial. And equally invariably, they do not present a powerful work scenario, but some odd hodgepodge including shopping lists or contrived examples. #Docear multiple pdf links with one pdf file softwareNow: Screenshots and examples for visualization and mind mapping software (and the screenshot shown above is the perfect example), are invariably weak. So you can immediately understand that this software is powerful the difficulty will be to reproduce this with your own work. Even the simplest 2D CAD software usually advertises with insanely cool looking sports cars supposedly drafted with that application. However, one thing makes me suspicious: Usually, screenshots provided by the proponents are naturally making a particularly strong case. Maybe I’m just not the type to make sense of mind maps, and others might immediately “resonate” with them. Now, I can understand that different minds work differently. I always come to the conclusion that simply lists and good search capabilities are superior. I’ve tried hard, checked out mind maps and similar approaches. I just cannot get anything out of these visualizations. I apologize in advance for my biased view, but I am truly curious. Here is a particularly interesting visualization: So in my view, visualization experts should tackle a 3rd party product tying in, and selling it separately. But Soma-Zone’s Ammonite application demonstrates that it is possible to make word clouds etc. I am not at all familiar with the possibilities of 3rd party software interfacing with DT to tap the information contained in DT. I’m interested if anyone knows of other, similar solutions to DocEar that I might be able to use with DTPO?ĭevonthink needs to stay focused on its core business (e.g. #Docear multiple pdf links with one pdf file how toDocEar has many of the features that, from time to time, I try to figure out how to replicate within DTPO. Indeed, I’d love to be able to get more detail from the classification engine so that I could integrate visualizations from R and other Apps.Īll this being said, there is another App out there that is intriguing me. For example, I don’t think there is an Outliner, Todo app, MindMapper, Knowledge Management, system out there that I don’t either own or for which I’ve had a trial.Īs I mentioned, classification is the most interesting part of DTPO for me. Over the years, I’ve tried many, many applications. Moreover, as I write technical documents, it helps me find references. The classification features help me figure out what to read if I’m just not ‘getting it’ in one document.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |